Kenosha is about 20 miles northeast of Rittenhouse’s home in Antioch, Illinois, and 40 miles south of Milwaukee. The video demonstrates fairly clearly that the first person shot that night, Joseph Rosenbaum, appeared to lie in wait for Rittenhouse hiding behind a car and that when the teen jogged. The unrest in Kenosha drew Rittenhouse across state lines and into Kenosha, where he was armed with an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle during protests. Rittenhouse and scores of other people were on the streets of Kenosha after the shooting of Blake, a Black man, by a white police officer two days earlier. A Wisconsin jury on Tuesday watched a high-definition drone video of the moments before Kyle Rittenhouse shot one of two men he killed in August 2020. 25, 2020, protest of the police shooting of Jacob Blake. Rittenhouse, now 18, is facing six charges connected to the killings of Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, 26, and the wounding of Gaige Grosskreutz, during the Aug. The infrared video, grainy and shot from 8,500 feet overhead, shows Rittenhouse hustling along a sidewalk and passing Rosenbaum, who is positioned next to a cluster of parked cars. Richards put his head down, as if he were " charging like a bull" at the witness, and Kelley agreed the defense's interpretation could also be valid. Doug Kelley, testified that the fatal shots were fired at a downward angle with Rosenbaum being horizontal, suggesting the victim wasn't a threat at that moment.īut defense attorney Mark Richards implied that Rosenbaum could still have been a danger to Rittenhouse, who squeezed off four shots in 0.76 of a second. The enhanced video showed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, apparently chasing Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse, 17 at the time, turned and opened fire at close range, killing Rosenbaum.Ī forensic pathologist, Dr. Associated Press writer Tammy Webber contributed from Fenton, Michigan Kathleen Foody from Chicago.A Wisconsin jury on Tuesday watched a high-definition drone video of the moments before Kyle Rittenhouse shot one of two men he killed in August 2020. “That’s a losing argument for sure.”įorliti reported from Minneapolis Bauer from Madison, Wisconsin. “You can’t just say, ‘The state gave me a lower-quality video and therefore I get a mistrial,'” Meyn said. While the Kyle Rittenhouse jury continues deliberating a verdict, lawyers for both sides argued over a video shown on Tucker Carlsons show related to the sh. Julius Kim, a Milwaukee-based defense attorney who has been watching the case, said a mistrial could be declared even if the judge finds it was an honest mistake or a technical problem.īut to win a mistrial, the defense will have to meet a high bar and explain to the judge why what happened actually hurt Rittenhouse, said Ion Meyn, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School. The prosecution has rested its case in the murder trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, but not before showing the jury new high-definition drone video from the deadly confrontation during last summer’s. But if he is found guilty, a mistrial ruling would essentially void the verdict. If Rittenhouse is acquitted, the dispute won’t matter. He warned that if it turns out the video should not have been admitted into evidence, “it’s going to be ugly.” The judge said the mistrial request will have to be addressed if there is a guilty verdict. “We’re focusing too heavily on a technological glitch,” prosecutor James Kraus said. He has become somewhat of a hero to gun-rights advocates which, aer viewing the drone video of the scene as it. Prosecutors told the judge Wednesday that the jury saw the highest-quality version during the trial and that it was not the state’s fault that the file size got smaller when received by the defense. But the key moment in the footage is hard to decipher because of how far away the drone was and how small a figure Rittenhouse is in the frame.Ī smaller file size or lower-resolution video file is fuzzier and grainier, particularly if played on a larger screen, said Dennis Keeling, an adjunct professor in the cinema and television arts department at Columbia College Chicago. That request was prompted by what the defense said were improper questions asked by prosecutor Thomas Binger during his cross-examination of Rittenhouse.Īs for the drone video, the prosecution contends it proves Rittenhouse lied on the stand when he said he didn’t point his rifle at protesters. 547 86K views 1 year ago LIVE TRIAL DAY 6: The jury at KyleRittenhouse ’s murder trial watched drone video that showed Joesph Rosenbaum following Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse suddenly. Last week, the defense asked for a mistrial with prejudice, meaning Rittenhouse could not be put on trial again. Rittenhouse’s lawyers say they only received a copy of the drone video on November 5th, after the trial started, and that instead of the 11. E-Pilot Evening Edition Home Page Close Menu
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |